Files
2026-07-03 21:07:25 +02:00

1.7 KiB

CURSOR_INTERACTIONS.md

Verdict: near-zero custom cursor work — by design

Custom cursors (dot followers, magnetic buttons, cursor-morphing) were evaluated and rejected for this site. Reasons, documented so the decision survives future redesign itch:

  1. Audience mismatch. P1 recruiters on trackpads/mobile never see it; P2 engineering managers disproportionately dislike cursor gimmicks (input latency, hijacked expectations).
  2. Brand mismatch. "Kontrollrom" promises precision and restraint; a floating blob promises an agency reel.
  3. Cost. Pointer-following JS is the classic source of main-thread jank — the exact failure mode this site must never exhibit.

What ships instead (native cursor semantics, used correctly)

Context Cursor Note
Links, buttons, cards, TOC pointer Whole project card = pointer (it's one link)
Fact chips (non-interactive) default Honest affordance — no fake clickability
Text/prose text Never suppressed
Screenshot in lightbox (zoomable) zoom-in / zoom-out The one "delight" allowed
Click-to-copy e-mail copy Native, semantically perfect, zero JS cost
Diagram nodes with hover-highlight default + visual highlight Hover is enhancement, not interaction — pointer would over-promise
Disabled controls not-allowed

The single permitted flourish

On the hero, the status dot at the end of the trace shows a crosshair-style precision hover halo (pure CSS, 160ms) revealing a mono tooltip: status: open to work / status: åpen for muligheter. Desktop-only easter egg; invisible to touch, absent under reduced motion, no positional JS. If it ever measures as jank — cut it without debate.