feat: Seeded acceptance-ready job data through the live API with determ…

- "scripts/s06-acceptance-data.sh"
- "scripts/s06-acceptance-data.test.sh"
- "README.md"
- ".gsd/KNOWLEDGE.md"
- ".gsd/DECISIONS.md"
- ".gsd/milestones/M001/slices/S06/tasks/T02-SUMMARY.md"

GSD-Task: S06/T02

.gsd/DECISIONS.md

@@ -18,3 +18,4 @@
 | D010 | M001/S03 closeout | followup-drafting | How follow-up grounding should be exposed to the workspace | Return explicit follow-up grounding fields (`contextSummary`, `contextSignals`, `threadSubject`, and last-correspondence metadata) from the backend DTO instead of making the React workspace infer them client-side. | The slice needed draft trust, not just draft text. Putting grounding signals in the API contract gives the UI a durable explanation surface, keeps thread/package inference in one place with generation logic, and makes backend/frontend tests assert the same source of truth. | Yes | agent |
 | D011 | M001/S05 planning | workflow-trust | How S05 should represent daily-loop readiness and next-action state across overview surfaces | Introduce explicit workflow trust/action signals from the backend/UI contract and reuse them across the table, dashboard, reminders, and shared workspace instead of continuing to infer behavior from free-form `followUpReason` strings or raw `notes` presence in each component. | S05 is an end-to-end polish slice where the remaining risk is fragmented trust, not missing subsystems. Centralizing workflow signals avoids heuristic drift between overview surfaces, respects the saved application-answer notes-block constraint, and gives the final integrated regression one source of truth for R010 while preserving the explicit manual-send boundary required by R008. | Yes | agent |
 | D012 | M001/S05 | workspace-observability | Where linked Gmail thread continuity status should be exposed in the final trust loop | Show linked-thread refresh state directly in the correspondence workspace, including linked thread count and last refresh outcome, instead of hiding continuity feedback inside the Gmail import modal only. | The end-to-end trust loop depends on users being able to verify that already-linked Gmail threads stay current without re-importing. Surfacing continuity state in the main workspace keeps the job timeline trustworthy, supports final UAT, and avoids making thread refresh feel like a hidden one-off import behavior. | Yes | agent |
+| D013 | M001/S06/T02 | seeding | How acceptance-ready job data is created for S06 live reruns | Seed the acceptance fixture through the live companies/jobapplications/correspondence API plus the dedicated tailored-cv, application-drafts, and followup endpoints, using deterministic company/title/thread/message identifiers for idempotent reruns. | The slice goal is a repeatable live environment check, so seeding through the same HTTP contract the UI uses proves the real backend surface, keeps package/readiness behavior aligned with production code paths, and avoids brittle direct DB mutations or duplicate correspondence on reruns. | Yes | agent |