cesnimda
f0f178d77e
Deep, code-grounded audit of Job Tracker producing the mission deliverables under docs/remaster/: system audit, bug report, architecture/data-model/AI/UX reviews, remaster proposal, migration plan, competitor research, and the gated REBUILD_DECISION. Verdict: Incremental Refactor (no full rebuild). Evidence: no Critical defects; hardened cookie/CSRF auth (token never in JS storage), real SSRF defence, enforced multi-tenancy via global query filters, decoupled provider-swappable AI service, 135 backend tests. Debt is localised (god controllers/entity, missing hot-path indexes, prompt-injection hardening, CRA build debt) and reachable by in-place, test-guarded refactors. Also harden .gitignore: exclude agent tooling (.claude/, .bg-shell/, .agent.md) and restore/broaden the runtime-secrets block (**/keys/, **/backups/, exports, CV artifacts) so nested DataProtection keys can't be committed accidentally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Remaster Audit — July 2026
Full-system audit, bug hunt, and rebuild-vs-refactor assessment of Job Tracker (Jobbjakt).
Bottom line: ✅ Incremental Refactor — a full rebuild is not justified. See
REBUILD_DECISION.md (the gate). No JobTrackerV2 created; awaiting approval to
begin MIGRATION_PLAN.md Wave 1.
Documents
- SYSTEM_AUDIT_REPORT.md — executive synthesis + full audit
- BUG_REPORT.md — severity-rated defects (no Critical found)
- ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW.md
- DATA_MODEL_REVIEW.md
- AI_SYSTEM_REVIEW.md
- UX_REVIEW.md
- REMASTER_PROPOSAL.md
- MIGRATION_PLAN.md
- RESEARCH_COMPETITORS.md
- REBUILD_DECISION.md
Method
Every finding is code-grounded (file/line) or explicitly labelled [Speculative issue]. Tags:
[Bug] [Design flaw] [Architectural weakness] [Speculative issue]. .gsd legacy cross-referenced as
historical design intent (it is git-ignored and stays out of the repo).