Connor
2.1 KiB
depends_on
| depends_on | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
M004: Trust, launchability, and hardening — Context Draft
Gathered: 2026-03-24 Status: Draft — needs milestone-specific discussion before planning
Seed from broader discussion
The app already has meaningful breadth: auth, Gmail integration, AI service integration, drafting, reminders, imports, dashboards, and admin/system pages. Once the core workflow is strong enough, the next need is likely hardening: making the product clearer, safer, more diagnosable, and easier to live with over time.
Intended milestone role
M004 likely focuses on trust, clarity, and operational hardening after the core workflow is proven. This includes the quality of validation, clarity of failure modes, performance, launch readiness, and operational confidence for a product used repeatedly during a real job search.
Likely capabilities
- clearer validation and failure visibility
- UX and terminology cleanup where the product still feels messy or inconsistent
- performance and reliability improvements around key surfaces
- stronger operational/admin clarity for self-hosted or deployed use
- final trust surfaces around how AI and integrations behave
Constraints already known
- the product must preserve manual control over outbound communication
- hardening should support the individual-first workflow rather than introducing enterprise complexity
- changes should build on the existing architecture rather than force a platform rewrite
What this milestone unlocks
A product that not only has the right workflow, but also feels solid, comprehensible, and trustworthy enough for sustained daily use and future expansion.
Open questions for future discussion
- Which hardening gaps are most painful in actual use by the time this milestone arrives?
- What launchability bar matters for this project: self-hosted personal use, broader deployment, or something in between?
- Which trust/diagnostic surfaces are most important for AI-assisted correspondence and drafting?
- What level of polish is necessary before the product feels genuinely finished rather than just feature-complete?